PENGAWASAN DPR DAN POLITIK KARTEL ERA REFORMASI: STUDI KASUS INTERPELASI DANANGKET TAHUN 1999−2011
Abstract
reality of legislative oversight in the reformation era. This perspective explains that
political parties are increasingly dependent on the state resources. Consequently, the
relationship between political parties in the legislature and the voters they represent is
weakened. The quantity of oversight conducted by the parliamentduring the reforma
tion era does not necessarily indicate the quality of the representation. The process and
outcome of the inquiries and interpellations proposed in the parliamentrepresent the
interests of the parties rather than that of the people. The competition in the parliamen
tis merelya political bargaining mechanism among political parties, particularly to get
access to the public resources. With costlycampaigns, all parties arehighly dependent
on the state finances. There are various corruption cases involving politicians from
different parties, which are evidenced of the phenomenon of political cartel.
Keywords: legislative oversight, DPR, Era Reformasi, eartelization
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amalia, Luky Sandra. 2011. “Fungsi Pengawasan DPR, 2004-2009: Antara Nurani
dan Kehendak Fraksi”, dalam Wawan Ichwanuddin (ed.). Pengawasan DPR
Era Reformasi. Laporan Penelitian P2P LIPI.
Ambardi, Kuskridho. 2009. Mengungkap Politik Kartel: Studi tentang Sistem Kepar
taian di Indonesia Era Reformasi. Jakarta: KPG.
Budiatri, Aisah Putri. 2011. “Fungsi Pengawasan DPR, 1999–2004: Mewakili Partai,
Mengabaikan Rakyat?”dalam Wawan Ichwanuddin (ed.). Pengawasan DPR
Era Reformasi. Laporan Penelitian P2P LIPI.
Croissant, Aurel and Philip Volkel. 2012. “Party System Types and Party System
Institutionalization: Comparing New Democracies in East and Southeast Asia”.
Party Politics, No. 18(2): 235–265.
Evans, Kevin Raymond. 2003. The History of Political Parties and General Elections
in Indonesia. Jakarta: Arise Consultancies.
Hague, Rod, Martin Harrop, and Shaun Breslin. 1998. Comparative Government and
Politics: An Introduction, 4th edition. Basingstoke : Macmillan Press.
Haris, Syamsuddin. 1993. “Dilema DPR: ‘Wakil Daerah’ Tanpa Mandat Rakyat
Daerah” dalam Afkar, Vol. 1/No.2 April–Juni 1993.
Haris, Syamsuddin. 2009. “Dilema Presidensialisme di Indonesia Pasca-Orde Baru
dan Urgensi Penataan Kembali Relasi Presiden-DPR” dalam Moch Nurhasim
dan Ikrar Nusa Bhakti (ed.). Sistem Presidensial dan Sosok Presiden Ideal.
Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ichwanuddin, Wawan. 2011. “Fungsi Pengawasan DPR, 2009–2011: Akuntabilitas Dua
Angket di Awal Masa Jabatan” dalam Wawan Ichwanuddin (ed.). Pengawasan
DPR Era Reformasi. Laporan Penelitian P2P LIPI.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-All or Cartel?: A Rejoinder”
dalam Party Politics, Vol. 2, No. 4: 524–534.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair. 2002. “Changing Models of Party Organization and
Party Democracy: The Emergence of Cartel Party”, dalam Party Politics, Vol.
, No. 1: 5–28.
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies Pattern of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Democracies. New Haven and London: Yale University
Press.
Linz, Juan J. and Arturo Valenzuela (eds.). 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
Press.
MacIvor, Heather. 1996. ”Do Canadian Political Parties Form a Cartel?” dalam Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 2: 317–333.
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination” dalam Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1993:
–228.
Meneffee-Libey, David. 1991. “Divided Government as Scapegoat”dalam PS: Political
Science and Politics, Vol. 24, No.4: 643–644.
Pelizzo, Ricardo and Sick Stapenhurs. 2008. “Tools for Legislative Oversight: An
Empirical Invetigation” dalam Rick Stapenhurs, et al. (eds.), Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Sanit, Arbi. 1985. Perwakilan Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1985.
Sherlock, Sthephen. 2010. “The Parliament in Indonesia’s: Decade of Democracy:
People’s Forum or Chamber of Crobies?”, dalam Edward Aspinall and Marcus
Mietzner (eds.). Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society. Singapore: ISEAS.
Soetjipto, Ani, et al. 2009. Kerja untuk Rakyat. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Politik UI.
Tomsa, Dirk. 2010. “The Indonesian Party System after the 2009 Elections: Towards
Stability?”. Edward Aspinall and Marcus Mietzner (eds.). Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society. Singapore: ISEAS.
Yishai, Yael. 2001. “Bringing Society Back In: Post-Cartel Parties in Israel” dalam
Party Politics, Vol. 7, No. 6: 667–687.
Thurber, James A. 1991. “Representation, Accountability, and Efficiency in Divided
Party Control of Government”, dalam PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol.
, No. 4.
Ziegenhain, Patrick. 2009. ”The Indonesian Legislature and Its Impacts on Democratic
Consolidation”, dalam Marco Bunte and Andreas Ufen (eds.). Democratization
in Pos-Soeharto Indonesia. London and New York: Routledge.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
