PENGARUH NEGARA DAN ORGANISASI KEAGAMAAN PADA KEBIJAKAN SEKOLAH BERBASIS AGAMA

Mohamad Yusuf, Carl Sterkens

Abstract

This paper describes different models of religious education that have been adopted by Islamic, Christian and Hindu schools in Indonesia. We describe the educational goals, teaching methods and curriculum content, as well as the opinions of teachers and headmasters concerning religious education. Moreover, we examine the institutional influence of State and religious communities on religious education in these schools. We selected three areas in which, respectively, Muslims, Christians and Hindus were in the majority. In each area, we selected five secondary schools (Sekolah Menengah Atas or SMA): three schools representing the majority group in the concerning area, and two schools belonging to religious minority groups. We interviewed fifteen headmasters and nineteen teachers of religion. We found that most religiously affiliated schools employ a mono-religious model of religious education. Even though some schools introduce teachings about other religions in their curriculum, the perspective is from their own point of view. The Catholic school in West Java (Christian minority) offers an inter-religious model of religious education. Moreover, we discovered that the State and religious communities influence the policies of religious education at school level in different ways. In Islamic schools, all types of institutional power from both the State and religious communities are responded positively. In Christian schools the influence of the State is less strong than in Islamic schools. In Hindu schools the States regulations are very influential on the policies of religious education.

Keywords: Religious Education, Institutional Power, Religious Schools, Headmaster, Teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baldwin, David. 1971. The Power of Positive Sanction. World Politics, 24: 19-38.

Berns R.M. 2003. Child, Family, School, Community: Socialization and Support. 8th edition. California: Wadsworth.

Blau, Peter M. 2009. Exchange and Power in Social Life. Third printing. New York: Wiley and Sons.

Bjork, Christopher. 2004. Decentralization in Education, Institutional Culture and Teacher Autonomy in Indonesia. International Review of Education. 50 (3/4): 245-262.

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1991. Language and Symbolic Power (John B. Thompson, ed.; terj. Gino Raymond dan Matthew Adamson) Cambridge: Polity Press. 37-42.

Etzioni, Amitai. 1961. Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. Glencoe Ill: Free Press.

------------. 1964. Modern Organization. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

Fallona, C. 2000. Manner in Teaching: a Study in Observing and Interpreting Teachers Moral Virtues Teaching and Teacher Education. 16: 681-695.

Hermans, Chris A.M. 2003. Participatory Learning Religious Education in a Globalizing Society. Leiden, Boston: Brill.

Ichwan, Moch Nur. 2006. Official Reform of Islam. State Islam and the Ministry of Religious Affairs in Contemporary Indonesia 1966-2004, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Jackson, Robert (ed). 2003. International Perspectives on Citizenship, Education and Religious Diversity. London: Routledge Falmer.

Jansen, Harrie. 2010. The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 11 (2): 11.

Kster, Volker. 2011. Einfhrung in die Interkulturelle Theologie. Gttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Lehman, Edward W. 1969. Toward A Macrosociology of Power. American Sociological Review. 34: 453-465.

McCracken, G. 1988. The Long Interview. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publication.

Millham, Roger Bullock and Paul Francis Cherrett. 1972. Social Control in Organization. The British Journal of Sociology 23 (4): 406-421.

Sterkens, Carl. 2001. Interreligious Learning. The Problem of Interreligious Dialogue in Primary Education. Leiden, Boston: Brill.

Strauss, Anselm dan Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. (Second edition) California: Sage Publication.

Vermeer, Paul dan Van der Ven. 2004. Looking at the Relationship between Religions an Empirical Study among Secondary School Students. Journal of Empirical Theology, 17 (1): 36-59.

Ziebertz, Hans-Georg dan William K. Kay (eds). 2005. Youth in Europe I. An International Empirical Study about Life Perspectives, Munster: Lit Verlag.

Ziebertz, Hans-Georg dan Riegel Ulrich (eds). 2009. How Teachers in Europe Teach Religion. An International Empirical Studies in 16 Countries. International Practical Theology, 12, Berlin: Lit Verlag.

Ziebertz, Hans-Georg. 2007. A Move to Multi? Empirical Research Concerning the Attitudes of Youth Towards Pluralism and Religions Claims of Truth. Dalam D. Pollefeyt, Interreligious Learning, (hlm. 20-38), Leuven Paris: Dudley MA.

Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 tahun 2007 tentang Pendidikan Agama dan Pendidikan Kegamaan.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Pengelolaan Pendidikan.

Peraturan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 tahun 2010 tentang Pengelolaan Pendidikan Agama Pada Sekolah.

Copyright (c) 2016 Masyarakat Indonesia

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.