MAMPUKAH SUBAK BERTAHAN? STUDI KASUS KETAHANAN SOSIAL KOMUNITAS SUBAK PULAGAN, GIANYAR, BALI
Abstract
Most of literature on Subak studies emphasize on the nature of Subak management system rather than its dynamic respond to contemporary social change. However, this article focuses on how Subak community respond to the rapid social change namely massive tourism industry and water shortage. Based on the case of water dispute between Subak Pulagan and PDAM Gianyar, the author argue that the amplification of cultural and symbolic recognition is an effective strategy for bargaining position in the conflictual relation in order to preserve Subak existence. The research method is case study through fieldwork, interviews, and observation.
Keywords: Subak, tourism industry, world cultural heritage, dispute
ABSTRAK
Sebagian besar literatur dalam studi tentang Subak menekankan perhatian terhadap sistem pengelolaan subak daripada respons komunitas tersebut terhadap perubahan sosial kontemporer. Akan tetapi, artikel berikut ini fokus kepada ketahanan sosial komunitas (community resilience) Subak Pulagan dalam merespons cepatnya perubahan sosial yang terjadi, yakni pesatnya industri wisata dan krisis air. Berdasarkan kasus yang terjadi pada sengketa air antara komunitas Subak Pulagan dengan PDAM Gianyar, penulis berargumen bahwa amplifikasi terhadap rekognisi simbolis dan budaya merupakan strategi yang efektif dalam menjaga posisi tawar dalam relasi konflik sehingga mampu menjaga kelestarian eksistensi Subak. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan studi kasus melalui kunjungan lapangan, wawancara, dan observasi.
Kata kunci: Subak, industri wisata, krisis air, warisan budaya dunia, sengketa
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Biro Pusat Statistik Bali. (2016). Kedatangan wisatawan mancanegara ke Provinsi Bali 2011–-2015. Denpasar: Biro Pusat Statistik.
Biro Pusat Statistik Gianyar. (2016). Kecamatan Tampaksiring dalam angka 2016. Gianyar: Biro Pusat Statistik.
Berkes, F. & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society &Natural Resourcs: An International Journal, 26(1), 5–20.
Cole, S. (2012). A political ecology of water equity and tourism: A case study from Bali. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 1221–-1241.
Community & Regional Resilience Institute. (2013). Definitions of community resilience: An analysis. Washington DC: Community & Regional
Resilience Institute.
Dinas Pariwisata Bali. (2016). Perkembangan kunjungan wisatawan pada daya tarik wisata di Bali tahun 2003–-2015. Denpasar: Dinas Pariwisata
Bali.
Geertz, C. (1972). The wet and the dry: Traditional irrigation in Bali and Marocco. Human Ecology, 1(1), 23–-39.
Hauser-Schaublin, B. (2011). Land donations and the gift of water: On temple landlordism and irrigation agriculture in pre-colonial Bali. Human
Ecology, 39(1), 43–53.
IDEP. (2016). Bali water protection program. Gianyar: IDEP Foundation.
Jha, N. & Schoenfelder J. W. (2011). Studies of the Subak: New directions, new challenges. Human Ecology, 39(1), 3–10.
Kementrian Pariwisata. (2016). Pertumbuhan kunjungan wisatawan nusantara tahun 2015. Jakarta: Kementerian Pariwisata.
Lansing, J. S. (1987). Balinese “water temples†and the management of irrigation. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 326–341.
______. (2007). Edisi Ketiga. Priests and programmers: Technologies of power in the engineered landscape Bali. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Lansing, J. S. & de Vet, T. A. (2012). The functional role of Balinese water temples: A response to critics. Human Ecology, 40, 453–467.
Lansing, J. S. &. Kremer, J. N. (1993). Emergent properties of Balinese water temple networks: Coadaptation on a rugged fitness landscape. American Anthropologist, 95(1), 97–114.
Lorenzen, R. P. (2015). Disintegration, formalisation or reinvention? Contemplating the future of Balinese irrigated rice societies. The Asia
Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 16(2), 176–193.
Lorenzen, R. P. & Lorenzen, S. (2008). Institutionalising the informal: Irrigation and government intervention in Bali irrigation develoment.
Water for People, 51(1), 77–-82.
______. (2011). Changing realities-perspectives on Balinese rice cultivation. Human Ecology, 39(1), 29–42.
Lorenzen, R. P. & Roth, D. (2015). Paradise contested: Culture, politics, and changing land and water use in Bali. The Asia Pacific Journal of nthropology, 16(2), 99–105.
MacRae, G. S. & Arthawiguna, I. W. A. (2011). Sustainable agricultural development in Bali: Is the Subak an obstacle, an agent or subject?
Human Ecology, 39(1), 11–20
Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 23(5), 401–416.
Norris, F. H., S. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K. F. Wyche, and R. Pffeferbaum. (2008). ‘Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster’. American Journal of Community Pyschology. 41, pp. 127–150.
Roth, D. (2014). Environmental sustainability and legal plurality in irrigation: The Balinese Subak. Current Opinion in Environmental
Sustainability, 11, 1–-9.
Roth, D. & Sedana G. (2015). Reframing tri hita kirana: From Balinese culture to politics. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 16(2), 157–175.
Schulte-Nordholt, H. (2011). Dams, dynasty, and the colonial tansformation of Balinese irrigation management. Human Ecology, 39(1), 21–27.
Straub, S. (2011). Water conflicts among different user groups in South Bali, Indonesia. Human Ecology, 39(1), 69–79.
Walhi Bali. (2016). Eksploitasi air Ssetelah 1990. Denpasar: Walhi Bali
Yoga, P. AAGR. (2015). Relasi pertanian dan pariwisata di persimpangan jalan: Studi komparasi praktik pariwisata pada dua Subak di Kecamatan Tampaksiring, Kabupaten Gianyar. (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar).
Berita Online
Alih fungsi lahan produktif di Bali meningkat. (2015, 3 April). Republika. Diakses pada 8 Agustus 2016 dari http://www.republika.co.id/berita/
nasional/daerah/15/04/03/nm7wfc-alih-fungsilahan-produktif- di-bali-meningkat
Ancaman terhadap Subak kian besar. (2016, 17 September). Kompas. Diakses pada 17 September 2016 dari http://print.kompas.com/baca/sains/
kebudayaan/2016/09/17/Ancaman-terhadap-Subak-Kian-Besar
Bahas penggunaan sumber mata air. (2016, 18 Januari). Denpost. Diakses pada 11 Agustus 2016 dari http://denpostnews.com/2016/01/18/bahas- penggunaan-sumber-mata-air/
Beginilah antisipasi ketergantungan pangan di Subak kawasan budaya dunia. (2015, 14 Juli). Mongabay. Diakses pada 10 Agustus 2016 dari http://www.mongabay.co.id/2015/07/14/beginilah-antisipasi- ketergantungan-pangandi-Subak-kawasan-budaya-dunia/
Lima tahun 54 Subak hilang. (2012, 2 Mei). Antara. com. Diakses pada 5 Agustus 2016 dari http://bali.antaranews.com/berita/21917/lima-tahun-
-Subak-hilang
MA nyatakan mantan Dirut PDAM Gianyar korupsi. (2016, 24 Juni). Denpost. Diakses pada 9 Agustus 2016 dari http://denpostnews. com/2016/06/24/ma-nyatakan-mantan-dirutpdam-gianyar-korupsi/
Penuhi kemauan Subak, PDAM Gianyar ingatkan konsekuensi gangguan air di wilayah ini. (2016, 20 Januari). Tribun Bali. Diakses pada 14 Agustus 2016 dari http://bali.tribunnews. com/2016/01/20/penuhi-kemauan-Subakpdam-
gianyar-ingatkan-konsekuensi-gangguan-air-di-wilayah-ini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
